Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
JURASSIC MONTH- My Theory For Jurassic-World 2 by Taliesaurus JURASSIC MONTH- My Theory For Jurassic-World 2 by Taliesaurus

Being that I'm a dino-geek and a big fan of the Jurassic Franchise (essence my "JURASSIC MONTH" event), you can understand that although is still a full year away...
I AM SUPER HYPED FOR JURASSIC WORLD 2
This is because of two reasons:

1- It will be continuing an surprisingly realistic story, that creates a reality in many, similar to our own.
2- It will be asking a pretty thought-provoking question:
"Would an formerly "extinct" animal have the same rights as a "normal" animals?"

And it is the later point that I'm focusing on with today's post.
You see, Colin Trevorrow (one of the people working on the story)
said this

"The Dinosaurs will be a parable of the treatment of today's animals: abuse, experiments in medicine, unhealthy pets, haing wild animals in circuses like prisons, GMO farm-animals, military use has been made of them- animals being used as weapons."

Basically, what that means is that very likely, the dinosaurs might be modified to be integrated in human society. And they they are thought off less as animals, and more as "property/software".

...and I imagine that a Bio-genetics company like InGen might use their gene-splicing abilities to make dinosaurs that can survive harsh environments so that they can be given to developing countries as a substitute for farm-animals.

Here is the Example I've speculated, what you have here is a dinosaur whose DNA was modified from the herbivorous biped called Psittacosaurus that originally stood only two feet tall.
But when given the modified growth hormones of Sauropods (long-necked dinosaurs), and given sturdier legs (and a modified beak), they become what I call:
"Pssitco-splice Meat-Breed 48"
a creature that can grow to the size of a buffalo and has huge fat-layers on it's belly, it's back and it's neck.

These docile mutants are given to developing coutries like Botswana (Africa) and Mongolia (Asia) as livestock because they grow three times as bulky as an average bull, but are "engineered" to require less food than bulls.

And, as an added bonus, they are prized for their delicious eggs as well as their juicy meat.

 (The original dinosaur is on the left, the modified one is on the middle)

Add a Comment:
 
:iconthatdinosaurguy:
ThatDinosaurGuy Featured By Owner Jun 27, 2017
I had a theory very similar to this only they used the dinos to restart dying or damaged ecosystems. Such as modifying raptors to hunt down wild boars or invasive snakes in the everglades.    
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 27, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
well that might work as well, but more likely is that they put dinosaurs in the wild to fill in gaps of the ecosystem
Reply
:iconantonellisofbbender:
AntonellisofbBender Featured By Owner Jun 25, 2017  Student Filmographer
it sure looks like placerias
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I can ee what you mean, but really, it is a genetically modified pssiticosaurus 
Reply
:iconantonellisofbbender:
AntonellisofbBender Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Student Filmographer
i understand that and my comment is just a comment or compliment
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
1- huh?

2- what else do you like about it?...
Reply
:iconantonellisofbbender:
AntonellisofbBender Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Student Filmographer
it even reminds me of some of creatures in Peter Jackson's King Kong
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
1- how so?

2- which one?
Reply
:iconantonellisofbbender:
AntonellisofbBender Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Student Filmographer
because of it's look and the fact is most of the creatures on skull island happen to be strange looking descendants of real extinct animals
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
oh....

but as a "livestock creature" what do you think?
Reply
(1 Reply)
:icontcr11050:
tcr11050 Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
Looks like a Placerias.
Reply
:iconantonellisofbbender:
AntonellisofbBender Featured By Owner Jun 25, 2017  Student Filmographer
i agree
Reply
:icontcr11050:
tcr11050 Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
:)
Reply
:iconantonellisofbbender:
AntonellisofbBender Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Student Filmographer
:D
Reply
:icontcr11050:
tcr11050 Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
:)
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I admit it does a little...
Reply
:icontcr11050:
tcr11050 Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
:)
Reply
:iconzealandiatherium:
Zealandiatherium Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2017  Student
EXTRA THICC
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
well, yes kinda. Would you eat a burger made of this creature's meat?
Reply
:iconzealandiatherium:
Zealandiatherium Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2017  Student
Yessssssssssss B0ss
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
what other roles could modified dinosaurs be put in?
Reply
:iconzealandiatherium:
Zealandiatherium Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2017  Student
How about Pets, like Dog breeds. For this you could use Raptors as dogs and compys for cats for something, and then wat i'd think would happen is you would modify a certain trait out of them and you could have a new line of Modified extinct animals.
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I suppose, I mean that is technically the case with these animals- JURASSIC MONTH-Gigcephalus (Popular household pet) by Taliesaurus
Reply
:iconzealandiatherium:
Zealandiatherium Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2017  Student
OHH yeah forgot about that one, Maybe race animals or hybirds
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
that would be cool, especially with gallimimus
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconzealandiatherium:
Zealandiatherium Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2017  Student
as Live-stock?
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
what sort of lives stock? and where in the world do you recommend?
Reply
:iconzealandiatherium:
Zealandiatherium Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2017  Student
Like dairy, exept cause dinos don't produce milk or wat, and may be sauropods that eat forests. You think of it. I got no real good ideas. 
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
well dinosaur would be prized for their eggs and meat and horns/ivory...
Reply
(2 Replies)
:iconthederpasaur:
TheDerpasaur Featured By Owner Jun 8, 2017  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Neato idea!
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 8, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
what do you like about it?
Reply
:iconthederpasaur:
TheDerpasaur Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2017  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
People using dinosaurs for their own benefits
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
yeah, in this case, for the creatures meat and eggs.

what other roles in the world do you think modified dinosaurs could be put in?
Reply
:iconthederpasaur:
TheDerpasaur Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2017  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Hm, Prey animals for pets, beasts of burden, and circus animals
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
what sort of dinosaurs could you imagine being modified to do so?
Reply
:iconthederpasaur:
TheDerpasaur Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2017  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
prey animals, smaller theropods etc

Beasts of burden, ceratopsian and sauropods

Circus, Any famous dinosaur
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
let's go with the beasts of burden idea, how should that look?
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconevodolka:
Evodolka Featured By Owner Jun 8, 2017  Hobbyist Artist
i would probably think "they better make the smaller breed a type of pet" and "i would call it a meat ball"
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 8, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
the "smaller breed" is the original dinosaurs Psittacosaurus- 1.bp.blogspot.com/-vdZCMq1bMN8…
Reply
:iconevodolka:
Evodolka Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2017  Hobbyist Artist
i know but i feel like it would get it's own name like "small breed" or "original breed"
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
maybe.... I could imagine it as a household pet that requires the least modifications...

But by the way, what other roles in the world do you think modified dinosaurs could be put in?
and how might they look?

ideas range from:

-the circus
-pets
-"pack-mules"
-experiments in medicine (like people do with rats)
-military use
-guard animals
Reply
:iconevodolka:
Evodolka Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2017  Hobbyist Artist
probably be called a dino pug if anything :D

. circus = none existent because they don't do animals anymore and that is perfect because i hate how cruel they are
. pets = i can picture some theropods to fill the roles of dogs as they are modified to be small i think of it like this:
Tyrannosaurs = Labradors
abelisaurs = bulldogs
wile dromeosaurs like velociraptor could be altered to be like a cat
. pack mules = hadrosaurs, ceratopsians and ankylosaurs
. military = large theropods like tyrannosaurus rex, giganotosaurus and MAYBE spinosaurus
. gaurd = drameosaurs
Reply
:icontaliesaurus:
Taliesaurus Featured By Owner Edited Jun 10, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
those are awesome idea, I'll find some way of implementing them.

But the whole idea of what i is the question "Would an formerly "extinct" animal have the same rights as a "normal" animals?"

Because what some people of this universe think is this-

"An extinct animal that is brought back to life has no rights."
"they exists because we made them."
"We patented them."
"We Own Them"

So I think there might be circuses in some parts of the world because they might think: "Oh, these aren't real animals, we made them, they belong to us"
that is the 
ethical question that JW2 is asking. That these "resurrected" Dinosaurs might be subjected to cruel things that "normal" animals are already protected from.

They could, if they wanted, genetically engineer a Dino that is completely dim, so they can experiment on it. you understand?

so what do you think of that?
Reply
:iconevodolka:
Evodolka Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2017  Hobbyist Artist
i tried my best :bow:

yes, if anything it has even more rights as it should know what death is, there have been some animals that WERE extinct but found again and they are guarded round the clock

. that sounds really stupid, like saying "people of the future don't have rights because they technically aren't alive YET"
. same can be said about dogs and they get a ton of rights that if they are broken the owner gets WRECKED
. (read 2nd point)
. technically at this point we own the world, or at least most of it

true that would happen, but the'y probably be getting stopped at various points like how drug dealers get busted even though there are like 6 others
that seems like a law that should be fixed right there :D

by dim do you mean an idiot or do you mean depressed? :o

sounds depressing and realistic, i like it :D
Reply
(1 Reply)
Add a Comment:
 
×





Details

Submitted on
June 8
Image Size
3.4 MB
Resolution
5828×3246
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
674 (6 today)
Favourites
30 (who?)
Comments
85
×